| |
SEVERAL TIMES since I became President
I have been asked whether or not the Society of Motion Picture and Television
Engineers can carry water on both shoulders-meaning of course, is it possible
for the Society to serve the needs of both motion pictures and television
at the same time. My answer is that the Society has been and is now serving
these related interests successfully. It intends to continue doing so in
the future with increasing effectiveness. In the eyes of the engineer no
conflict exists between motion pictures and television because both are
mutually related methods of pictorial communication-they both provide pictorial
rendition of action that has occurred at another place or at another time.
Because the two are very closely related, I believe their techniques and
their processes can be applied interchangeably on a broad scale, resulting
in joint contributions of great value. The change of the Society's name
a year ago to include the word "television" was formal recognition by the
engineers of these interrelationships.
Just as
television has come to rely heavily on motion picture films and on the techniques
of motion picture studio production, so must the motion picture producer
and exhibitor seek out, experiment with, and adopt new techniques that appear
to have commercial possibilities. This calls for courage and imagination
unclouded by the fears which the present economic conditions have produced
within the motion picture industry.
Remembering
the economic boost that followed the introduction of sound, many people
have said recently that great new technical strides must be taken at once
to keep the motion picture industry prosperous. In my opinion the present
state of affairs is quite the contrary, however, because technical contributions
already at hand are far ahead of the industry's willingness to adopt them.
The lack of interest in commercializing these developments now may have
the effect |
|
of applying a brake on future technical
growth. If allowed to continue, it could become a demoralizing influence
upon our engineers and research workers. I refer not only to the early application
of television by the motion picture industry but also to: the potentialities
of the increased use of color, multiple sound tracks, wide angle pictures
and stereoscopy. Any of these things might recapture the interest of the
moviegoing public.
In our
Society we have been able to unite engineers from the motion picture field
with engineers from radio and from other fields into a unified organization
in which one group complements the other. Has the same result been accomplished
within the motion picture industry? I am afraid it has not. Do the engineer,
producer and exhibitor work hand in hand? The answer is an unequivocal No.
The past
success of the motion picture industry was made possible by men who had
the intuition to foresee its great potential future and were willing to
risk time and money in exploiting it. It is quite possible that this same
Pioneering spirit will be needed again before the technological advancements
already known are properly applied.
Unfortunately,
in many instances the men who head lie motion picture industry and who should
translate invention into commercial reality have become so economy minded
that their first question concerning a new technical process or product
is -What will it cost?" and not "How can it benefit this industry?"
We in
the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers are constantly improving
the technical elements of the pictorial rendition of action. It is now up
to the producers and exhibitors of motion pictures to take advantage of
our technical developments and to continue their business as the most effective
medium of mass education and entertainment yet devised. |
|